QA feedback tool
Help QA and product teams capture website issues during testing with screenshots, recordings, and investigation context that engineering can trust.

Spreadsheets and chat threads flatten bugs into short lines. Developers then re-test blindly or bounce tickets as “cannot reproduce.”
A QA feedback tool should preserve evidence from the moment the tester found the issue.
Testers use OwlTrace on the environment under test to file issues with visual proof and optional session or network context.
That keeps QA feedback closer to the product experience instead of a detached checklist comment.
Exercise flows on staging or production.
Spot a defect, regression, or UX break.
Screenshot, record, or write from the OwlTrace widget.
Environment details and session or network data travel with the report.
Sync to Jira or Trello when that is your system of record.
Engineering reproduces with the evidence; QA retests the same path.
Capture exactly what the user saw when they reported the issue, without asking them to attach a file.
Let reporters record a short session and share a link when a still screenshot is not enough.
Review the clickstream and user journey leading up to the broken state so you can see what they did.
Inspect request method, status, duration, and payload context alongside the visual report.
Optionally auto-create Trello cards or Jira issues, or append rows to Google Sheets.
Automatically detect broken images, missing assets, and dead links on pages.
Yes. It helps QA capture visual and technical context while testing. It is not a full automated test runner.
No. OwlTrace focuses on capturing human-found issues with evidence. Use it alongside your existing automated tests.
Start free and add visual bug reporting to your site in minutes.